Wagschal v. Board of Examiners
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
As stated in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, petitioner has not established that respondent’s denial of her application for a permanent school psychologist license lacked a rational basis. Accordingly, the lower courts properly refused to substitute their judgment for those of public officials in charge of the educational system (see, Morley v Arricale, 66 NY2d 665, 666-667; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).
We find no merit in petitioner’s contention that she was arbitrarily…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morley v. ArricaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arrocha v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Restituyo v. BerbaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Ignizio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011