Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Van Culin

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1943No. 2506PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, C. J.

Henry S. Reynolds and Ms wife Avis Reynolds each sued Samuel Van Culin for damages for personal injuries suffered by them as the result of a collision between two automobiles one of which was being operated by the defendant. The plaintiffs were passengers in the automobile being operated by the defendant, and they attribute the collision and their resulting injuries to the alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of said automobile.

The two cases were consolidated for trial and resulted in a verdict and judgment against the defendant in each of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Eyler v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Clark v. President of the Manufacturers' InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Fitzjarrell v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. HoangHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. County of Kaua'i Ex Rel. Nakazawa v. BaptisteHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lyon v. BushHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Striker v. NakamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API