Legal Opinion
Enochs Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Garber
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the circuit court of Hinds county. Hon. W. H. Potter, Judge. Proceeding by the Enochs Lumber & Manufacturing Company and others, materialmen, against J. C. Garber, contractor and others. Judgment that rights of parties were equal to concurrent was affirmed and plaintiffs suggest error which was sustained. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
Per Curiam. Affirmed.
On Suggestion oe Error.
The agreed statement of facts is as follows:
“Come the parties to the above-styled cause by their attorneys of record, and agree: That the agreed statement of facts and the judgment of the court rendered thereon shall constitute the transcript of the record in the case of the Enochs Lumber & Mfg. Company et al. v. I. C. Garber et al., appealed from the circuit court of the First district of 'Hinds county, Miss,, to the supreme court of Mississippi, and that the two documents shall be certified as such and be considered a full transcript in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
- Herrin v. Warren & MobleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- McNair v. M. L. Virden Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Citizens' Lumber Co. v. NettervilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Amerihost Development, Inc. v. Bromanco, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998