Legal Opinion
Arthur Murray Studio of Washington, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1972No. 71-1807Published
1Opinion of the Court
458 F.2d 622
1972 Trade Cases P 73,895
ARTHUR MURRAY STUDIO OF WASHINGTON, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 71-1807.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
March 21, 1972.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 11, 1972.
Tom M. Schaumberg, Washington, D. C., for petitioners; Gadsby & Hannah, Washington, D. C., of counsel.
Joseph Martin, Jr., Ronald M. Dietrich, Gen. Counsels, Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Duncan, Thomas F. Howder, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pacific Molasses Company, a Corporation, and James M. Ferguson, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- S. Dean Slough v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.