Legal Opinion

People v. Mit Singh

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1922No. Crim. No. 899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

From the evidence adduced at the trial it appears that the prosecuting witness and her husband lived in a small tank-house on the ranch of a man named Brown, which was about a block from a family named Carrillo. According to the prosecutrix, Singh came to her door about noon of December 25, 1921, in the absence of her husband. When she met Singh at the door he forcibly seized her and attempted to “hug and kiss” and throw her to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People v. BruggyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. QuimbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AndreasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. State v. StevensMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Privitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API