Legal Opinion

E. Nadine Rodgers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1959No. 16020PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

Appellant appeals from the judgment of the district court, sitting without a jury, a jury having been expressly waived in writing and in open court by the appellant, finding her guilty of the offense 1 of illegal importation of narcotics and sentencing her to custody for five years.

We will first outline the history of the proceedings leading up to the judgment from which appellant appeals in order to properly posture the grounds on which appellant relies for reversal.

There is no claim by appellant that she did not illegally import narcotics from the Republic of Mexico…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfred Esteban Azhocar, United States of America v. Alfred Esteban AzhocarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. Ruth SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Chin Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Ruth Johnson Williams and Fred Cook, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API