Legal Opinion

Federal National Bank v. O'Keefe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract brought by a writ, dated August 1, 1923, to recover upon a promissory note, payable to the order of the Federal Trust Company for $5,040, and dated July 30, 1919. The ad damnum is in the amount of $6,500. The defendant’s answer set up the plea of payment.

On April 11, 1927, the judge allowed the addition to the declaration of "Count 2,” which reads: "And the plaintiff says that it is the successor to the Federal Trust Company, in accordance with provisions of laws in such cases made and provided; that the defendant executed an instrument, in writing, reading as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitney v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Driscoll v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Durant v. BurtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Salter v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Olson v. ElaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Cahalane v. PoustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. Barrette v. HightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API