Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 27, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the 'Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

The appellant brought this suit against the appellees to recover for personal injuries she sustained when she fell while walking on a toll bridge owned and operated by the appellee, Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Company, hereinafter referred to as the bridge company. At the close of her evidence the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the appellees and from the .judgment entered on that verdict she appeals.

At the time of her accident the appellant was living-in Covington, Ky., but was employed by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Snider v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Bridgford v. Stewart Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Weston v. . New York Elevated Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. R. B. Tyler Co. v. Kirby's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Covington v. KealCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Evans v. Muscatine Bridge Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API