Legal Opinion

Robertson v. . Robertson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBauNhill, J.

The debt due J. P. Eobertson, which he seeks to have declared a charge upon the interest of Bessie Coleman in the personal estate of her deceased father, is not her debt but the debt of her husband. The referee so found. Not only are these findings binding upon the plain tiff, wbo did not appeal, but they are supported by the plaintiff’s own testimony. In respect thereto he testified as follows : “It was all charged to E. D. Coleman and Hubert. ... I have not charged a single item of this account to Bessie Coleman. I have never charged one cent to Bessie Coleman. ... I would not say that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Pocomoke Guano Co. v. ColwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClure v. McClureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Maxton Housing Authority v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API