Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Cassasa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The plaintiff Bessie M. Carlisle brought action to recover for personal injuries which she sustained from the bite of a dog owned by defendant Catherine Cassasa and harbored by her brother, the defendant Charles Cassasa. The plaintiff Joseph M. Carlisle brought a separate action against said defendants to recover for loss of services and expenses incurred in the surgical treatment of his wife, the plaintiff in the first action, and other expenses resulting from the injuries which his wife sustained. The actions, by stipulation, were tried together.

The plaintiff Bessie M. Carlisle resided with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Perrotta v. PiccianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. DeVaul v. Carvigo Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Machacado v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Roupp v. ConradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Ford v. SteindonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API