Legal Opinion

Angell v. Enfield

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 1986No. C9-86-365Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is a personal injury action arising from the collision of two vehicles at an intersection. Appellant Arlen Angelí claims error in the trial court’s instructions on right of way. We affirm.

FACTS

By special verdict, the jury found Arlen Angelí negligent when his motorcycle, heading west on Oakland Avenue in Austin, collided with Loren Enfield’s car. En-field, driving south on Second Street, stopped for the stop sign and pulled out onto Oakland, where he was struck by the motorcycle. The jury, apparently crediting evidence that Angelí was speeding, found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Marriage of Wehner v. WehnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API