Legal Opinion

Paine v. Foster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Logan County; before E. B. Green, District Judge. Action by Yeeder B. Paine against John Foster and others, trustees of townsite board No. 6. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff brings error!

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by The court having been unable to reach a conclusion in this case, I desire to place of record my individual views on the questions involved.

This is a suit in equity to have the defendants declared trustees for the plaintiff in error. The action grows out of the complications arising from the early settlement of a portion of the townsite of Guthrie. It would appear from the record in the case that on the 22d day of April, 1889, Veeder B. Paine was in the Iowa reservation, about ten or eleven miles east of the townsite of Guthrie, and that at 12 o'clock, noon, of said day, he rode on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  4. Roofing Wholesale Co., Inc. v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Higgs v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API