Glas v. Glas
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action is prosecuted to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant to plaintiff.
The plaintiff had judgment, and this appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
After the execution of the note and mortgage, the defendant filed a declaration of homestead upon the mortgaged premises, and appellant’s principal contention is that the plaintiff, who is the wife of the defendant, cannot foreclose the mortgage because of the-declaration of homestead so filed by the husband.
1. This contention can be best stated in the pathetic-language…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hewitt v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Campbell v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- R.G. Hamilton Corp., Ltd. v. CorumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Phillips v. Union Central Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Wooten v. DahlquistIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Kleinsorge v. KleinsorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sellman v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.