Legal Opinion

Maxey v. Monahan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 20, 2007No. 06 C 5153PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Brian Maxey (“Maxey”), a civil detainee held at a state facility, originally brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) action pro se, seeking relief against multiple defendants. Those defendants who are relevant to the current motion are Carol Vance, Jovita Anyanwu and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (for convenience collectively “Addus,” treated as a singular noun). After this Court appointed Jason Burlingame (“Burlingame”) to represent Maxey, Bur-lingame engaged in settlement negotiations with Addus’ counsel Eydie Glassman (“Glassman”).

Ma…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Midland Hotel Corp. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. William P. Wilson v. John G. Wilson, Thomas S. Wilson, and Fsw, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Brewer v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pritchett v. Asbestos Claims Management Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API