George E. Wood Lumber Co. v. Morris
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
A vendor of real estate may maintain a bill for specific performance against his purchaser. Melton v. Stuart, 213 Ala. 574, 105 So. 659; Fuller v. Totten, 222 Ala. 174, 131 So. 435; Eaton v. Sadler, 215 Ala. 161, 110 So. 10. And the fact that the land is situated in another state is not an objection to such relief if the parties are within the jurisdiction of the court. Hume v. Kirkwood, 216 Ala. 534, 113 So. 613; Hall v. Milligan, 221 Ala. 233, 128 So. 438, 69 A. L. R. 618.
Complainant and respondents entered into a contract by which the former agreed to sell, and the latter agreed to buy,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Collins v. WhighamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Nelson v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Davis v. Folmar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Eaton v. SadlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penney v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Gorr Lumber Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Summers v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.