Legal Opinion
Coral Gables, Inc. v. Patterson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 21, 1937No. 3 Div. 184PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Complainant seeks specific performance of certain contracts for the purchase of lots 1 to 7, block 20 of the Biltmore section of Coral Gables, Fla., complainant being successor in title to Coral Gables Corporation.
These purchase contracts were made by one Kolar with the latter corporation, and alleged to have been assumed by Patterson, the defendant.
Upon former appeal (Coral Gables v. Patterson, 231 Ala. 649, 166 So. 40), the holding was that the bill was without equity, and the decree sustaining demurrers thereto was accordingly affirmed. Complainant thereupon made…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Potter Realty Co. v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Straus v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- R. E. L. McCaskill Co. v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Webb v. RidgelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. BashamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- JKLB FARMS, LLC v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Vulcan Materials Company v. BelcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.