Legal Opinion
Varnadore v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 21, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 3:90-2202-19PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHEDD, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action seeking review of a decision by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) imposing a sanction on Ann Vamadore and Little Convenience Store for violating the Food Stamp Act by selling ineligible nonfood items in exchange for food stamps. Specifically, the FNS determined that the plaintiff violated 7 C.F.R. 278.6(e)(3)(ii), allegedly because it was the firm’s practice to sell conspicuous nonfood items, cartons of cigarettes and alcohol beverages in exchange for food coupons, and disqualified the Little Convenience Store from participating in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James T. Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Plaid Pantry Stores, Inc., Dba Plaid Pantry Store No. 65 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Anthony M. Wong Chung C. Wong, Dba Rotary Grocery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- David Carlson, D/B/A Liberty Supermarket v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Plaid Pantry Stores, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kawran Bazar, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017