Legal Opinion

David Carlson, D/B/A Liberty Supermarket v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 7, 1989No. 88-2866PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

This case centers on a decision by the United States Department of Agriculture (the “Department”) to disqualify the plaintiff’s store from participation in the Food Stamp Program for a period of five years. Plaintiff argues that this action was arbitrary and capricious because it was inconsistent with the applicable federal regulatory scheme. The district court, although ' it characterized the penalty as “harsh,” nonetheless concluded that the Department’s action was neither arbitrary nor capricious. We agree with the district court on both accounts, and we affirm.

I

David…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Donald Kulkin, Etc. v. Robert BerglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Affum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  2. Thomas Brooks, Plaintiff/counterdefendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant/counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Central National Bank of Mattoon v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Brooks v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Dinner Bell Markets, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API