David Carlson, D/B/A Liberty Supermarket v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
This case centers on a decision by the United States Department of Agriculture (the “Department”) to disqualify the plaintiff’s store from participation in the Food Stamp Program for a period of five years. Plaintiff argues that this action was arbitrary and capricious because it was inconsistent with the applicable federal regulatory scheme. The district court, although ' it characterized the penalty as “harsh,” nonetheless concluded that the Department’s action was neither arbitrary nor capricious. We agree with the district court on both accounts, and we affirm.
I
David…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donald Kulkin, Etc. v. Robert BerglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Affum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Thomas Brooks, Plaintiff/counterdefendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant/counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Central National Bank of Mattoon v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Brooks v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Dinner Bell Markets, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.