Legal Opinion
United States v. North Coast Transp. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 27, 1947No. Civ. No. 1675PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
Defendants’ Motions were consolidated pursuant to Rule 12, Subdivision (g), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is based upon the contention that only legal conclusions have been pleaded.
In Paragraph 15, Subdivision V, Page 5 of the Complaint, it is alleged: “Beginning in or about the year 1934, and continuing thereafter up to and including the date of the filing of this Complaint, the defendants have contracted and have been and now are engaged in a combination and conspiracy unreasonably to restrain, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Johns-ManvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
- United States v. Griffith Amusement Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1940
- Washburn v. Moorman Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Catfish Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
- Troyer v. KarcagiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Vermilion Foam Products Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. Carriage Way West, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- National Research Bureau, Inc. v. BartholomewDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971