Legal Opinion

Gordon v. State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1980No. 110,939, CA 16462PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

Petitioner, an inmate of the Oregon State Penitentiary, sought habeas corpus relief, ORS 34.310 et seq., alleging that the board of parole’s application of the parole matrix system, ORS 144.780-144.785, to his sentence resulted in his being incarcerated subject to an ex post facto law, Art I, § 10, United States Constitution; Art I, § 21, Oregon Constitution. Defendant’s demurrer on the ground of lack of jurisdiction was sustained and petitioner appeals.

In May, 1976, petitioner was given a parole hearing and received a parole date of May, 2006. In May, 1978, petitioner was informed that a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Harris v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Sterling v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Billings v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API