Legal Opinion

Wade v. Seeburg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1985No. 9317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Archie and Margie Wade appeal from a judgment awarding Joe Seeburg a portion of the proceeds of a fire insurance policy covering property they purchased from Seeburg. Although Seeburg was not named in the fire policy, the court awarded him a portion of the proceeds on the ground that the Wades had contracted with him to keep the property insured for his benefit. The Wades contend it was improper for the judgment to award Seeburg the proceeds directly, the pleadings are insufficient, and the judgment unjustly enriched Seeburg. We will affirm the judgment.

The Wades…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Corp. v. Super-Cold Southwest Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Abilene White Truck Company v. PetreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Westview Drive Investments, LLC and Jack Yetiv v. Landmark American Insurance Co., and King-Phillips Insurance Agency, Inc. AKA Insurtrust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Co. v. Trinity National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Hatley v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API