Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hatley v. Payne

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1988No. CA 87-341Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

The appellants have filed a petition for rehearing in this case decided by a panel of this court on June 8,1988. See Hatley v. Payne, 25 Ark. App. 8, 751 S.W.2d 20 (1988). The full court has today denied the petition, but I do not agree.

In my view, the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion for summary judgment should be reversed. My view is adequately explained by the following quotation from the appellants’ petition for rehearing:

Appellants’ cause of action is predicated upon the covenant to insure doctrine: “This court is committed to the doctrine that if a mortgagor covenants to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Lititz Mutual Ins. Co. v. MILLERMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  4. National Bedding & Furniture Industries, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Hatley v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API