Legal Opinion

Crandon v. Home Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1917No. 20,665PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Neosho district court; James W. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*786The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiffs obtained judgment against the defendant for the face value of a fire insurance policy covering their business building and its contents. The defendant appeals, admitting its liability on the building but complaining of the judgment as to its liability on the personalty.

■ The pleadings and the plaintiffs’ evidence develop the facts : The plaintiffs, father and son, were partners in a mercantile business in South Mound, in Neosho county. The defendant issued to them a fire insurance policy in two items, $1200 on their business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joffe v. Niagara Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Shawnee Fire-insurance v. KnerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Hammond v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Phenix Insurance v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Sedlachek v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Morgan v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Dobrauc v. Concordia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API