Sedlachek v. Home Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
This was an action on a fire insurance policy, and the serious question involved is whether the forfeiture of the policy by a violation of the encumbrance clause was waived by the adjuster after the loss had occurred.
The plaintiffs purchased a new automobile from a Ford agency, paying only a part of the purchase price, and the agency arranged for a loan for the balance of the purchase price with the -Universal Credit Company, to which company a chattel mortgage was given, and this fire insurance- policy was procured by the agency at the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- German Insurance v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- British America Assurance Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Phenix Insurance v. MungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Klein v. Farmers & Bankers Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Shawnee Fire-insurance v. KnerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lattner v. Federal Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Marett v. World Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Lohr v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936