Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kelsey v. Cameron

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1952No. 5374Published

1ConcurrenceLa Prade, Justice

I concur in the disposition of the. “second appeal”.

I cannot agree with the evaluation of the testimony in this case made by the majority in the “first appeal”, and therefore I dissent in the disposition made of this appeal and directing that the will be admitted to probate. If there is any rule of law that this court presumably adheres to it is that the judgment of the trial court, based on the verdict of a jury, will not be disturbed on appeal if there is any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. Carrow, 71 Ariz. 87, 223 P.2d 912; Chester v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. CornumArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. HicksArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kenton v. WoodArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Daily Mines Co. v. Control Mines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hillman v. BusselleArizona Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API