Flint v. Owl Land & Investment Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
— This is a plain action at law for damages for fraud and deceit claimed to have been practiced upon the appellants, plaintiffs, by the respondent, defendant, in connection with the sale to appellants by the respondent of real property in King county, described as follows: “Lot 9, block 27, Second Addition to Union City by H. L. Pike. According to the plat thereof on file with the auditor of King county, Washington.” The case was tried to a jury, and at the conclusion of the testimony on behalf of the appellants, the trial court directed a verdict for the respondent. The appeal is from a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Schroeder v. Hotel Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Dieterich v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Bimson v. BultmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ross v. KirnerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Ross v. KirnerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Hobson v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Ross v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Ross v. Ticor Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.