Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wade

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1976No. Appeal, 1759PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant contends that he is entitled to discharge because the Commonwealth failed to bring him to trial within the period required by Rule 1100, Pa.R.Crim.P. 1

On October 3, 1973, appellant was arrested and charged with receiving stolen property. 2 The following day, appellant was brought before District Justice Robert G. Mull of Chester County for a preliminary arraignment. Appellant was not represented by counsel at that time, but indicated that he intended to retain Fred T. Cadmus, III, Esquire, to defend him. The District Justice did not fix a time for a preliminary…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. WansleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API