Commonwealth v. Wade
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that he is entitled to discharge because the Commonwealth failed to bring him to trial within the period required by Rule 1100, Pa.R.Crim.P. 1
On October 3, 1973, appellant was arrested and charged with receiving stolen property. 2 The following day, appellant was brought before District Justice Robert G. Mull of Chester County for a preliminary arraignment. Appellant was not represented by counsel at that time, but indicated that he intended to retain Fred T. Cadmus, III, Esquire, to defend him. The District Justice did not fix a time for a preliminary…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WansleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.