Legal Opinion
Rose v. Rubenstein
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 4, 1985No. B14-84-838-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
Jules Rose appeals the denial of his request to modify child support. He presents five points of error. We affirm the trial court’s order.
Jules Rose is the father of Edward Mark Rose (“Eddie”), a 24 year old, mildly retarded young man. Mr. Rose was divorced from Eddie’s mother, Marlene Rose Ruben-stein, when Eddie was 16 and a younger son David was 14. In the original divorce decree, the court ordered Mr. Rose to continue to pay child support for Eddie past his eighteenth birthday, pursuant to TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 14.05(b) (Vernon 1975). Mr. Rose was ordered to pay…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Jackman v. JackmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Grandinetti v. GrandinettiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Red v. RedTexas Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wallace v. American Petrofina, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1987
- Westerhaus v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995