Wallace v. American Petrofina, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Harles H. Wallace, filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., alleging that the Retirement Committee of PINA, as the administrator of the Amdel, Inc., Non-contributory Retirement Plan (The Plan), failed to provide increased or additional benefits, and administered The Plan in an arbitrary and capricious manner. The court has recently denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, based upon improper venue, or in the alternative, to transfer this case to the United States District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jack D. Denton v. First National Bank of Waco, TexasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Lyons v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Miles v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund Employee Pension Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Young v. Kilroy Oil Co. of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- OLM Associates v. Bright Banc Savings Ass'n (In Re OLM Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989