Legal Opinion

United States v. Marion Promise, A/K/A Mario,defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2001No. 99-4737Published

1Opinion of the Court

255 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 2001)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARION PROMISE, a/k/a Mario,Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-4737

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Argued: February 27, 2001

Decided: June 29, 2001

Amended July 17, 2001

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-7-MU)COUNSEL ARGUED: Noell Peter Tin, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Nina Swift Goodman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Mark T.…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment · Wilkinson; Concurring in the judgment · Niemeyer; Concurring in the judgment · Luttig.

2Cases cited110 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API