Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Paul Girolamo, AKA Bari Mascitti
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1994No. 93-2151PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Richard Paul Girolamo appeals from the judgment and sentence entered pursuant to his conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession with intent to distribute less than fifty (50) kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(D).
Girolamo was indicted on September 2, 1992. Following initial appearances before a magistrate judge, his case was assigned to District Judge John E. Conway, United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
Prior to trial, Girolamo moved to suppress “[a]ny and all items seized from the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Michael BloomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Maurice McCurdyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Reginald Keith CarheeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Desirous Parties Unlimited Inc. v. Right Connection Inc., et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- United States v. Ignacio EscarenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995