Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Halama-Enderstein Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1933No. 3689PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

Appellee recovered verdict and judgment for $1,000 for personal injuries sustained by falling through a hole in the floor into the basement of a building owned by one Scholle, and in which, as lessee, appellant corporation was carrying on a general merchandise business.

Both the owner and the lessee of the premises were sued. Appellant alleged facts in its separate answer calculated to show that the negligence, if any, in making and maintaining the hole, was that of its codefendant, Scholle. These allegations were stricken out upon Scholle’s motion.

At the close of plaintiff’s case, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sais v. City Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Maynard v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bahr v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maggio v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jackson v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Dillon v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Waldroop v. Driver-Miller Plumbing & Heating Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Wright v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API