Legal Opinion

Green v. . Ballard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This was a motion by the defendant, Mrs. E. A. Ballard, to set aside a judgment against her, heard before Battle, J., at Chambers, by consent, as of April Term, 1894, of FraNK-LiN Superior Court. The motion was refused and the defendant appealed. Tbe facts appear in the opinion of Chief Justice Fatroloth.

1Opinion of the Court

Eairoloth, C. J.:

Prior to 1889 a special proceeding was instituted in FraNKMN Superior Court, by the administrator of "W. "W. Green, against his heirs-at-law, including the defendant E. A. Ballard and her husband W. H. Ballard, to sell land for assets. A sale was ordered and commissioners to sell were appointed, who sold, and the defendant E. A. Ballard bought a part of the land and gave her personal note to the commissioners for the purchase price with the written consent of her husband, and said sale was confirmed. The purchaser having defaulted in payment of said note, the commissioners…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. . SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Pippen v. . WessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. Vick v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Neville v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Griffith v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Hanover National Bank v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. McCauley v. . McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Rutherford v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. McLeod v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API