Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Broadway Central Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskatuer, J.

The defendant, a corporation organized under the Banking Law, appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The plaintiffs allege that they are a firm of stock brokers and that they purchased certain common stock of corporations “ for and on account ” of and at the defendant’s request and upon its promise to pay therefor. The defendant reimbursed the plaintiffs for some of these purchases. For others it refused to reimburse the plaintiffs, who thereupon sold the stock at a loss, which they seek here to recover.

The defendant attacks the complaint upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Appleton v. Citizens' Central National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Block v. Pennsylvania Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Snelling & Snelling Personnel Agency of Queens, Inc. v. NasirCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  4. Block v. Pennsylvania Exchange BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Block v. Pennsylvania Exchange BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API