Legal Opinion

Village of Scarsdale v. New York City Water Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 22, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, to review certain determinations of the respondent establishing the methodology for calculating the petitioners’ excess water consumption of the City of New York water supply and an action, among other things, for a judgment, in effect, declaring that the respondent’s determination as to establishing that methodology was invalid and directing it to calculate excess water consumption based upon the population and annual consumption figures for the entire Westchester County Water District No. 1, the petitioners appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Scarsdale v. JorlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Carhuff v. Barnett's Bake Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Village of Scarsdale v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bayley Seton Hospital v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Citylights at Queens Landing, Inc. v. New York City Department of Environmental ProtectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc. v. TweedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API