Legal Opinion
Baker v. Baltimore County, Md.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 26, 1980No. Civ. K-76-1016PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
In this class action plaintiffs, present or former Baltimore County police officers, seek injunctive and declaratory relief 1 from the continuing enforcement of Bill No. 138, which was enacted in 1959 by the County Council of Baltimore County and which is now codified as Title 20, Article II of the Baltimore County Code, 1968 Edition. Plaintiffs became members of the Police Department of Baltimore County on October 12, 1959. On October 15, 1959, the County Council passed Bill No. 138 amending the retirement plan applicable to County policemen. That ordinance…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maryland State Teachers Ass'n v. HughesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Andrews v. Anne Arundel County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Davis v. Mayor and Alderman of City of AnnapolisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Cherry v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Kestler v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.