Legal Opinion
State v. Dyer
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1996No. 96 CA 39PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frederick N. Young, Judge.
Carlos Dyer appeals his convictions for disorderly conduct and obstructing official business.
I
Dyer was arrested on February 23, 1996, and charged with disorderly conduct, a fourth-degree misdemeanor, and obstructing official business, a second-degree misdemeanor. Dyer was arraigned on February 26, 1996. Dyer pled not guilty to the charges. The case was set for trial on April 2,1996.
On March 12, 1996, Dyer, acting pro se, filed a motion to dismiss. In the final paragraph of the motion, Dyer wrote, “I don’t want a lawyer. I would like to represéntate [sic] myself.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Cleveland v. WhipkeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. HaagOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. EstridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. VordenbergeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.