Union National Bank v. Barth
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles G. Neely, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Samuel B. Barker, plaintiff in the trial court, sued L. L. Barth, the appellee, in assumpsit, for the use of the Union National Bank of Chicago, appellant, on a promissory note for the sum of $5,000, across the face of which note were written the words, “ This note is non-negotiable.” It appears that the note was deposited by Barker with the Union National Bank as collateral security for his indebtedness to the bank.
The declaration was filed in the name of Barker, as plaintiff, for the use of appellant, and the suit proceeded to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tedrick ex rel. Ruffner v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Hileman v. BealeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- American Express Co. v. HaggardIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Hobson v. McCambridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Hesing v. Attorney GeneralIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meyer v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905