Legal Opinion
Gildersleeve v. City of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 28, 2025No. 2:22-cv-02145Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WARIS GILDERSLEEVE, No. 2:22-cv-02145-JAM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO; BRIAN JUDGMENT BRUST, an individual; DAVID 15 LAUCHNER, an individual, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is the City of Sacramento, Brian Brust, and 19 David Lauchner’s (collectively, “Defendant(s)”) motion for 20 summary judgment. See Mot., ECF No.24. Waris Gildersleeve 21 (“Plaintiff”) opposed. See Opp’n, ECF No. 25. Defendant 22…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.