Legal Opinion

Jones v. Duff Grain Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1903No. 13,065PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county: Paul Jessen, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

Plaintiffs in error in this cause of action procured a judgment for $750 as attorneys at law for William J. Jones, against the Duff Grain Company, defendant in error, in the district court for Cass county. Subsequently, a supersedeas bond was filed and error proceedings were instituted in the supreme court to reverse said judgment by the defendant company. At the time of the institution of the original suit plaintiffs served the following notice of attorneys’ lien on the company:

“You are hereby notified that we have and claim an attorneys’ lien, for services rendered plaintiff by us…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ackerman v. AckermanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1862
  3. Elliott v. AtkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Oliver v. SheeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Fox v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barber v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fire Protection Resources, Inc. v. Johnson Fire Protection Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Tuttle v. WymanNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Railway Co. v. KaputIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Myers v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API