Ocean View Capital, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp. of America
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
*1042OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
This is a civil action for monetary, declarative and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and R.I.Gen.Laws § 6-36-4. Plaintiff Ocean View Capital, Inc. contends that defendants Sumitomo Corporation of America, Sumitomo Corporation, Sumito-mo Futures Corporation, Yasuo Hamana-ka, Global Minerals and Metals Corporation, David Campbell and Credit Lyonnais Rouse violated federal and state antitrust statutes by entering into a conspiracy to raise the price of copper to artificially high and noncompetitive levels through…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Loeb Industrial, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- In Re Copper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000