Legal Opinion

Ocean View Capital, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp. of America

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 9, 2000No. M.D.L. No. 1303, No. 99-C-801-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1042OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

This is a civil action for monetary, declarative and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and R.I.Gen.Laws § 6-36-4. Plaintiff Ocean View Capital, Inc. contends that defendants Sumitomo Corporation of America, Sumitomo Corporation, Sumito-mo Futures Corporation, Yasuo Hamana-ka, Global Minerals and Metals Corporation, David Campbell and Credit Lyonnais Rouse violated federal and state antitrust statutes by entering into a conspiracy to raise the price of copper to artificially high and noncompetitive levels through…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loeb Industrial, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  2. In Re Copper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API