Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Neil D. Salisbury

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 14, 2017No. Docket: Han-17-135Published

1Per curiam

[¶1] Neil D. Salisbury appeals from a judgment of conviction of operating after suspension (Class E), 29-A M.R.S. § 2412-A(1-A)(A) (2016), operating without a license (Class E), 29-A M.R.S. § 1251(1)(A) (2016), and operating an unregistered vehicle (Class E), 29-A M.R.S. § 351(1)(B) (2016), entered by the trial court (Hancock County, Mallonee, J.) after a jury found him guilty. On appeal, he primarily challenges the court’s jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment.

[¶2] Contrary to Salisbury’s contentions, as a matter of law, the court had both personal and subject matter jurisdiction over this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Mehlhorn v. DerbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. State v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. State v. HoflandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. State v. QuinnamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API