Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Titan Tire Corp.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, U.S. District Judge.
Two large, sophisticated companies made a deal.
But the deal did not turn out as favorably as Titan Tire would have liked.
Titan Tire now wants out.
The deal stands.
Judgment for Pirelli Armstrong.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation (Pirelli) sold a tire manufacturing facility in Des Moines, Iowa, to Defendant Titan Tire Corporation (Titan) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement. As part of the deal, Titan agreed to assume Pirelli’s liability for certain retiree medical benefits owed to the employees of the Des Moines facility.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Northern Trust Co. v. VIII South Michigan AssociatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Kurt Regensburger and Anna Regensburger v. China Adoption Consultants, Ltd., Kenneth Lubowich and Renee LubowichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Monahan v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Cole v. IgnatiusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States of America v. Jonathan A Barajas NavaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025