Legal Opinion
United States v. Haug
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 19, 1957No. Cr. Nos. 22225, 22226, 22230PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, District Judge.
The eight defendants have been indicted for conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States by filing with the National Labor Relations Board false-affidavits of non-Communist Union Officer (N.L.R.B. Form 1081). Title 18 U. S.C. § 1001, Title 18 U.S.C. § 371.
The defendants Fred Haug and Marie-Reed Haug have also been separately indicted for filing false affidavits of non-Communist Union Officer with the National Labor Relations Board. 18 U.S. C. § 1001. These charges, among others, are set forth as overt acts in the conspiracy case.
The defendants Fred Haug and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Clayton E. Gadsden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Connelly v. United States Dist. Court in and for the Southern Dist. Of California, Central DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Everest Melvin Hupman, Also Known as Melvin E. Hupman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- People v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Mack Dean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. CaliseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.