Legal Opinion
Public Citizen v. Carlin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 22, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2840(PLF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This case involves a challenge to General Records Schedule (“GRS”) 20, promulgated by the Archivist of the United States in 1995. Plaintiffs assert that GRS 20 — a regulation governing the disposal of electronic records created by agencies of the federal government — is arbitrary and capricious, irrational and contrary to law. Currently before the Court are defendants’ motion to dismiss and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the papers submitted, the arguments of counsel, the entire record and the applicable law, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Public Citizen,appellees v. John Carlin, Archivist of the United States,appellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS v. CheneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.