Petuskey v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentLavender, Justice
Because I am unable to find any Constitutional, statutory or inherent authority which would support the actions of the Respondent Administrative Judge as reflected in his orders AD 7-87-6, AD 7-87-19, AD 7-87-20 and AD 7-87-30,1 I would hold such orders to be void.
Neither can I agree with the majority opinion’s conclusion: “In ministerial matters, the District Court Clerk is subject to the authority of the Administrative Judge.”
If I were writing for the court I would confine the authority of the Administrative Judge over the Court Clerk to those instances where the Court Clerk has failed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hirsh v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rutledge v. WorkmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- St. John v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- State ex rel. Geers v. LaskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952