Wallace v. the State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Nathaniel Wallace was convicted of a single count of felony theft by shoplifting (OCGA § 16-8-14). Wallace appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial, contending that the trial court erred in improperly commenting on the evidence at trial in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57; failing to charge the jury that Wallace acted independently from his co-defendant; and admitting a store receipt as evidence of felony-level value. Wallace also contends that his trial counsel was ineffective. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Viewed in the light most…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- von Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quiller v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Matthews v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Weaver v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Quiller v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016