People v. Kreutz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The lineup was not impermissibly suggestive nor conducive to irreparable mistaken identification (see, Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293, 301-302). Defendant committed two robberies and four eyewitnesses of these incidents made positive and instantaneous identifications of defendant at the lineup which was conducted only a few days after the events occurred. “A primary policy consideration is that lineups should be conducted as close in time to the occurrence of the incident under investigation as possible” (see, People v Hawkins, 55 NY2d 474, 486, cert denied 459 US 846).
The police did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BourdonnayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. WileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. CurtinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.