Legal Opinion

Hecox v. Rollestone

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1908No. 89; No. 2,718PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. On Petition for Review.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

The question presented for decision on this record arises out of a controversy between a trustee in bankruptcy and a receiver appointed by a state court: respecting the right to the custody of certain property of the bankrupt. The Economic Gold Extraction Company, a corporation, in an involuntary proceeding, was *824duly adjudged a bankrupt, on the ground that five days prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, one A. A. Rollestone was put in possession of the property of the said company as receiver under the laws of the state of Colorado, in certain proceedings…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rathman v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. In re Diamond's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. In re StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. In Re RidingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  5. Pugh v. LoiselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API