Legal Opinion

State v. T.J.S.-M.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2019No. 96434-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion was filed for record IN CLIMCN OrPICE at3<lM)n !ooutr.anoE OF WASi^iGTON I DATE 3 0 201.Q Su^nL Carlson Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 96434-3 Respondent, V. En Banc TJ.S.-M., Petitioner. Filed MAY 3 0 2i1'9 J MADSEN,J.-—In this case, T.J.S.-M., a juvenile, challenges his suspended manifest injustice disposition. The Court of Appeals dismissed his claim on ripeness grounds. T.J.S.-M. contends his appeal is ripe for review. T.J.S.-M. also argues the trial court applied the wrong standard of proof during the sentencing…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API